Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Lovosice

IČO 00263991

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

49.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
POJIŠTĚNÍ MAJETKU, POJIŠTĚNÍ ODPOVĚDNOSTI ZA ŠKODU A POJIŠTĚNÍ VOZIDEL MĚSTA LOVOSICE
Pojištění majetku
2
Ø2 in industry
Revitalizace autobusového nádraží Lovosice
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Holoubkov, Lovosice - Rekonstrukce chodníků, vozovek a veřejného osvětlení
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Obnova mostu M-02 přes potok Modla, u Zdymadel - Lovosice
Stavební úpravy mostů
9
Ø8 in industry
Varovný systém pro město Lovosice
Technické testování, analýza a poradenství
5
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

59%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ČSOB Pojištovna, a.s.
1 30,426,271
Chládek a Tintěra, a.s.
1 18,372,085
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 9,571,674
SaM silnice a mosty Děčín a.s.
5 8,360,437
TELMO a.s.
1 3,381,803
Other suppliers 7 8,920,628

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 300,505,222
Unregulated purchases 375,511,789
Total 676,017,010

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
JŘBÚ - Obnova lávky L-03 přes potok Modla, u tenisových kurtů - Lovosice
Additional works
102,760

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

72%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 29% (5 from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.94 (average mistakes per contract)