Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Karviná

IČO 00297534

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

6.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

86%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
REKONSTRUKCE A MODERNIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU, MĚSTSKÝ STADION V KARVINÉ - RAJI - SO.03, SO.04, SO.10
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
REKONSTRUKCE A MODERNIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU, MĚSTSKÝ STADION V KARVINÉ – RÁJI – SO.11, SO.53
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
OBNOVA OBJEKTU A OKOLÍ KINA CENTRUM KARVINÁ
Konstrukční a stavební práce
8
Ø3 in industry
STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVY BÝVALÉHO OBJEKTU KB
Rekonstrukce budov
8
Ø5 in industry
REVITALIZACE VEŘEJNÝCH PLOCH V KARVINÉ - NOVÉM MĚSTĚ
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Awt Rekultivace a.s.
2 122,892,712
Ridera Stavební a.s.
1 75,748,150
Zlínstav a.s.
1 59,760,041
Jankostav s.r.o.
3 39,268,222
Vokd, a.s.
1 35,998,689
Other suppliers 29 157,561,472

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

63%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 491,529,290
Unregulated purchases 756,322,999
Total 1,247,852,289

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
REALIZACE DODÁVKY VODY A ODVÁDĚNÍ ODPADNÍCH VOD
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
3,183,030
Nové služby Technologického centra Karviná - elektronická úřední deska
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
413,900
REKONSTRUKCE A MODERNIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU, MĚSTSKÝ STADION V KARVINÉ – RÁJI – správce stavby dodatek č. 2
Dodatečné práce
Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 15%
Average requirements modifications count 1.15

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 38)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (4 from 38)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 38)
Missing supplier ID 5% (2 from 38)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 38)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 38)
Call and award notices contradict each other 3% (1 from 38)
Missing call for tenders 21% (8 from 38)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

42%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.88 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

82%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 38)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 38)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (3 from 38)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 38)
Supplier bankruptcy 3% (1 from 38)
Supplier donating to political party 24% (9 from 38)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (5 from 38)