Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Staré Město

IČO 00567884

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Základní umělecká škola ve Starém Městě
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
2
Ø4 in industry
Příprava území, inženýrské sítě pro RD Velehradská - 1.etapa
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Místní obslužná komunikace Louky Staré Město.
Výstavba silnic
12
Ø8 in industry
Revitalizace ulice Svatovítské, Staré Město
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce vnitřních instalací DPS č.p. 1707 Staré Město
Stavební úpravy domů
12
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

49%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
STAMOS Uherské Hradiště, spol. s r.o.
4 22,144,683
RYBÁRIK, s.r.o.
3 21,731,152
Vodohospodářské stavby Javorník-CZ s.r.o.
1 4,956,179
OTR Recycling s.r.o.
1 4,956,179
Dobráci s.r.o.
1 3,100,000
Other suppliers 2 1,259,454

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

63%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 163,812,578
Unregulated purchases 246,444,160
Total 410,256,739

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (1 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 20% (2 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 10% (1 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

57%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 70% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.50 (average mistakes per contract)