Small cities • 2016

Obec Petrovice u Karviné

IČO 00297585

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

37%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vícepráce při realizaci projektu „Petrovice u Karviné – kanalizace I. etapa“ č. 8
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Rámcová smlouva - realizace vysprávek a oprav komunikací
Makadamový štěrk, asfalt a dehtové písky
7
Ø4 in industry
Protipovodňový varovný, informační a monitorovací systém obce Petrovice u Karviné
Systém pro řízení vodního hospodářství
3
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka cisternové automobilové stříkačky v rámci projektu "Bezpečná hranice"
Hasičská vozidla
2
Ø2 in industry
Obnova veřejného osvětlení obce Petrovice u Karviné
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

58%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pozemní stavitelství Zlín a.s.
10 18,861,223
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 8,264,000
Master It Technologies, a.s.
1 7,500,964
Wiss Czech, s.r.o.
1 6,996,000
Čez Energetické služby, s.r.o.
1 5,057,905
Other suppliers 2 1,457,704

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

15%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

75%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 62% (10 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 62% (10 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

84%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 6% (1 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (2 from 16)