Large cities • 2016

Město Kopřivnice

IČO 00298077

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Court deemed all complaints against buyer invalid or insignificant.

24.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
"Rekonstrukce vnitřních rozvodů v bytových domech na ul. Štramberská č.p. 1132 - 1134 a na ul. Alšova č.p. 1139 - 1146 v Kopřivnici"
Stavební úpravy domů
3
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce zimního stadionu – I. etapa (rekonstrukce chlazení)
Kompresory pro chladící techniku
5
Ø3 in industry
Realizace projektu EPC v objektech města Kopřivnice
Energetické a související služby
4
Ø3 in industry
ZŠ Milady Horákové – energetická opatření – I. etapa
Tepelné izolace
7
Ø6 in industry
ZŠ Emila Zátopka - energetická opatření
Tepelné izolace
7
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Beskydská stavební, a.s.
3 43,065,222
Therm, spol. s r. o.
3 29,234,155
Mh - Stavby, s.r.o.
3 25,514,713
Colas Cz, a.s.
3 24,400,624
Hochtief Cz a. s.
1 23,898,649
Other suppliers 16 101,413,214

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

57%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 247,526,580
Unregulated purchases 518,023,308
Total 765,549,889

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

83%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

57%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 7%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 1.14

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (1 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (5 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 29)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 17% (5 from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

71%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.24 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 29)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (4 from 29)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 31% (9 from 29)