Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Kopřivnice

IČO 00298077

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is low. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

12.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

33%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce zimního stadionu – I. etapa (rekonstrukce chlazení)
Čerpadla a kompresory
5
Ø1 in industry
Celková rekonstrukce objektu vily v parku Ed. Beneše č.p. 243 v Kopřivnici
Rekonstrukce budov
4
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení obvodového pláště a nátěr střech – bytové domy č.p. 703 – 706, 707 – 710, 711 – 714, 785 – 786 v Kopřivnici
Rekonstrukce budov
1
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce povrchu ul. Štramberská - II.etapa
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících silniční dopravě
5
Ø9 in industry
Rekonstrukce povrchu ul. Štramberská - II.etapa
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících silniční dopravě
5
Ø9 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
THERM, spol. s r. o.
3 38,107,284
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
2 31,147,848
Beskydská stavební, a.s.
2 30,180,939
HOCHTIEF CZ a.s.
1 23,898,649
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o., odštěpný závod Dopravní stavby MORAVA
2 14,036,623
Other suppliers 17 82,802,844

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 407,269,237
Unregulated purchases 783,198,502
Total 1,190,467,739

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 30)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 30)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 30)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 30)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 30)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 3% (1 from 30)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 85% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.63 (average mistakes per contract)