City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 9

IČO 00063894

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

73%
average 53%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Park Balabenka
Krajinné úpravy parků
8
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace naučné stezky Amerika
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
UNIVERZÁLNÍ ŠKOLSKÝ OBJEKT LITVÍNOVSKÁ X VELTRUSKÁ
Výstavba základních škol
7
Ø5 in industry
VÝSTAVBA PAVILONŮ MATEŘSKÉ ŠKOLY U Vysočanského pivovaru, Praha 9 – opční právo
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Park Srdce II
Zařízení parků a hřišť
12
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Kaiser & spol. Cz s.r.o.
2 14,232,264
Gabriel s.r.o.
2 11,200,781
Genel Invest, s.r.o. "v likvidaci"
1 10,534,258
Z & D stavební společnost spol. s r.o.
2 9,744,614
Buldix s.r.o.
1 4,591,931
Other suppliers 4 4,398,911

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 62%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Inovativni 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

36%
average 81%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (1 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 17% (2 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 12)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 12)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 12)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (4 from 12)