City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 9

IČO 00063894

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba pavilonu při ZŠ Špitálská
Výstavba základních škol
4
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ Novoborská výstavba nového pavilonu
Výstavba základních škol
6
Ø5 in industry
Park Balabenka
Krajinné úpravy
8
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace naučné stezky Amerika
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
UNIVERZÁLNÍ ŠKOLSKÝ OBJEKT LITVÍNOVSKÁ X VELTRUSKÁ
Výstavba základních škol
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Ekologické a inženýrské stavby, spol. s r.o.
1 35,349,931
Auböck s.r.o.
1 14,768,445
KVS stavební, s.r.o.
1 14,768,445
Kaiser & spol. CZ s.r.o.
2 14,232,264
Gabriel s.r.o.
2 11,200,781
Other suppliers 6 31,553,362

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 6)
Nonprice competition 50% (3 from 6)
Lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

66%
average 88%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 7% (1 from 15)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 23% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.08 (average mistakes per contract)