Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Court deemed all complaints against buyer invalid or insignificant.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Muzejní a galerijní centrum v zámku Žerotínů
Rekonstrukce budov |
4
Ø5 in industry |
|
Nemocnice Valašské Meziříčí - Rekonstrukce stravovacího provozu
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Cyklostezka Bečva, Valašské Meziříčí - Juřinka
Výstavba cyklistických stezek |
12
Ø5 in industry |
|
ZŠ Křižná - výměna oken, dveří a zateplení fasád včetně rekonstrukce elektroinstalace
Stavební úpravy školních budov |
8
Ø5 in industry |
|
Regenerace panelového sídliště Křižná, lokalita Nádražní, Křižná a Vodní ulice
Stavební práce |
3
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
3v & H, s.r.o. |
1 | 34,999,999 |
|
Nosta, s.r.o. |
5 | 34,557,015 |
|
E F I O S spol. s r.o. |
2 | 25,844,296 |
|
Hochtief Cz a. s. |
2 | 23,591,896 |
|
Strabag a.s. |
1 | 16,879,943 |
| Other suppliers | 29 | 104,342,529 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
3v & H, s.r.o. |
1 | 34,999,999 |
|
Nosta, s.r.o. |
5 | 34,557,015 |
|
E F I O S spol. s r.o. |
2 | 25,844,296 |
|
Hochtief Cz a. s. |
2 | 23,591,896 |
|
Strabag a.s. |
1 | 16,879,943 |
|
4p Invest, s.r.o. |
2 | 15,199,018 |
|
Tm Stav, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 13,493,347 |
|
Jasy Vsetín s.r.o. |
2 | 12,307,509 |
|
Čsob Pojišťovna, a. s., člen holdingu Čsob |
1 | 10,183,951 |
|
Mh - Stavby, s.r.o. |
2 | 9,556,464 |
|
Sates Morava spol. s r.o. |
2 | 9,426,427 |
|
Cgm Morava s.r.o. |
1 | 6,999,474 |
|
Centropol Energy, a.s. |
3 | 5,750,940 |
|
Radekov spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,676,207 |
|
Komerční banka, a.s. |
1 | 3,634,664 |
|
Invista Craft s.r.o. |
1 | 2,985,003 |
|
Ts Valašské Meziříčí s.r.o. |
3 | 2,948,455 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
2 | 2,689,319 |
|
Allianz pojišťovna, a.s. |
1 | 1,794,210 |
|
Karel Kuneta |
1 | 1,513,840 |
|
Vemex Energie a.s. |
1 | 1,103,351 |
|
Bdo Advisory s.r.o. |
1 | 520,000 |
|
Nexia Ap a.s. |
1 | 300,000 |
|
Gordic spol. s r.o. |
1 | 260,350 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (3 from 0) |
| Nonprice competition | 7% (1 from 15) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 15) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% ( from 15) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 240,215,681 |
| Small scale tenders | 0 |
| Unregulated purchases | 402,926,279 |
| Total | 643,141,961 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Dodávka elektřiny v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky elektřiny na rok 2014 Not disclosed |
- | 1,631,850 |
|
Poskytování technických služeb ve městě Valašské Meziříčí - vícepráce Dodatečné práce |
- | 1,349,400 |
|
Nemocnice Valašské Meziříčí – Rekonstrukce stravovacího provozu - vícepráce Dodatečné práce |
- | 1,244,553 |
|
Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu na rok 2014 Not disclosed |
- | 1,103,351 |
|
Stavební úpravy hlavní budovy ZŠ Šafaříkova - fasáda - vícepráce Dodatečné práce |
- | 717,635 |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 5% |
| Cancelled contracts | 16% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.42 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 5% (2 from 40) |
| Final or estimated price not published | 12% (5 from 40) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Missing supplier ID | 2% (1 from 40) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Wrong buyer name | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Missing call for tenders | 5% (2 from 40) |
| Missing winning price | 0% ( from 40) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% ( from 40) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 74% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.74 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law) |
|
Do the risky firms win frequently? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Subcontractor share above 50 % | 10% (4 from 40) |
| Supplier demise shortly after contract | 0% (0 from 40) |
| Supplier bankruptcy | 2% (1 from 40) |
| Supplier donating to political party | 15% (6 from 40) |
| Supplier did not publish financial results on time | 18% (7 from 40) |
zIndex.cz
