Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Valašské Meziříčí

IČO 00304387

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

10.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Smuteční obřadní síň Valašské Meziříčí
Stavební úpravy zařízení sociální péče
4
Ø5 in industry
Nemocnice Valašské Meziříčí - Rekonstrukce stravovacího provozu
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
4
Ø4 in industry
Zlepšení tepelně-technických vlastností penzionu na ul. Tolstého ve Valašském Meziříčí
Stavební úpravy domů
2
Ø4 in industry
ZLEPŠENÍ TEPELNĚ - TECHNICKÝCH VLASTNOSTÍ OBVODOVÝCH KONSTRUKCÍ OBJEKTU KINA SVĚT VE VALAŠSKÉM MEZIŘÍČÍ
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
9
Ø4 in industry
Pojištění majetku a odpovědnosti za újmu
Pojištění
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
MH - STAVBY, s.r.o.
3 33,516,614
HOCHTIEF CZ a.s.
2 23,591,897
1. VASTO spol. s r.o.
1 15,685,963
E F I O S spol. s r. o.
1 10,699,490
ČSOB Pojišťovna, a.s., člen holdingu ČSOB
1 10,183,951
Other suppliers 23 66,804,806

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 71%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 329,593,434
Unregulated purchases 754,608,171
Total 1,084,201,606

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

79%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 11% (4 from 36)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 36)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 36)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 36)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 36)
Wrong buyer name 3% (1 from 36)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 36)
Missing call for tenders 3% (1 from 36)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.24 (average mistakes per contract)