Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Svitavy

IČO 00277444

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

58.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

29%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Centrální tělocvična pro výuku tělesné výchovy ve Svitavách
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Komunikace pro pěší podél I/43, Svitavy - Moravský Lačnov
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
5
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy Tovární 677/28, Svitavy
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce kanalizace ulice Pražská Svitavy
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
3
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce kanalizace Hybešova, Svitavy
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
3
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
HIKELE stavební firma s.r.o.
1 27,397,001
BMH spol. s r.o.
3 18,448,606
ALPINE Bau CZ a.s.
1 16,838,384
Ulehla Ivan s.r.o.
8 10,205,981
One Energy Česká republika a.s.
2 9,744,185
Other suppliers 18 62,775,195

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 300,580,417
Unregulated purchases 366,522,661
Total 667,103,078

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

55%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

86%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 35)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (7 from 35)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 35)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 35)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 35)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 35)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 35)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 35)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

36%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.24 (average mistakes per contract)