Small cities • 2016

Město Příbor

IČO 00298328

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is high. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

53.
ranking
76%
zIndex
Show average values  
90%
Bidder participation
71%
Winner concentration
84%
Pro-competitive tools
100%
Legal misconduct
100%
Competitive contracting
46%
Consistent conduct
78%
Journal data quality
82%
Supplier rating

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

90%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Stavební úpravy kulturního domu v Příboře
Úpravy budov
12
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace zahrady Piaristického kláštera v Příboře II.
Krajinné úpravy zahrad
5
Ø4 in industry
Sběr, svoz, přeprava, třídění, využívání a odstraňování komunálního odpadu na území města Příbor
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
5
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu ZŠ Npor. Loma v Příboře
Stavební úpravy školních budov
22
Ø5 in industry
Lávka pro pěší a cyklisty přes obchvat silnice I/58
Mosty
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
S u b t e r r a a.s.
 1 30,613,852
Nosta, s.r.o.
 1 17,408,204
Ave Cz odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
 2 13,261,610
Milimex S.a., odštěpný závod
 1 8,577,777
Cb s.r.o.
 1 8,261,339
Other suppliers 8 25,452,411

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

84%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (4 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Division into lots 17% (1 from 6)
E-auction 17% (1 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 6)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

46%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 1.71

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (4 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 7% (1 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 14)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

82%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 21% (3 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 29% (4 from 14)