Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Příbor

IČO 00298328

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Rekonstrukce domu č.p. 245 a 247 na ulici Jičínské v Příboře“
Rekonstrukce budov
9
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce chodníků a VO - Příbor, sídliště Benátky
Stavební úpravy chodníků
3
Ø6 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu ZŠ Npor. Loma v Příboře
Stavební úpravy školních budov
22
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy č.p.1346 na ulici Dukelské v Příboře
Stavební úpravy školních budov
19
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení nového hasičského automobilu pro JSDH Příbor
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

48%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
NOSTA, s.r.o.
2 37,408,497
MILIMEX s.r.o.-organizační složka
1 8,577,777
Tomáš STRAUB s.r.o.
1 6,950,635
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,235,000
VERA, spol. s r.o.
2 5,476,833
Other suppliers 4 7,557,214

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 75% (3 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 25% (1 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Inovativni 0% ( from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 156,956,204
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 266,150,171
Total 423,106,375

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

69%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (1 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (4 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 10)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.13 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu 8 zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek