Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Příbor

IČO 00298328

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
„Rekonstrukce domu č.p. 245 a 247 na ulici Jičínské v Příboře“
Rekonstrukce budov
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce chodníků a VO - Příbor, sídliště Benátky
Stavební úpravy chodníků
Ø6 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu ZŠ Npor. Loma v Příboře
Stavební úpravy školních budov
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy č.p.1346 na ulici Dukelské v Příboře
Stavební úpravy školních budov
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení nového hasičského automobilu pro JSDH Příbor
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
NOSTA, s.r.o.
2 37,408,497
MILIMEX s.r.o.-organizační složka
1 8,577,777
Tomáš STRAUB s.r.o.
1 6,950,635
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,235,000
VERA, spol. s r.o.
2 5,476,833
Other suppliers 4 7,557,214

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 75% (3 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 25% (1 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 156,956,204
Unregulated purchases 266,150,171
Total 423,106,375

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (1 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (4 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.13 (average mistakes per contract)