Small cities • 2016

Město Sušice

IČO 00256129

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

80%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sušice - R.O.P. (Rekreační Otavský Park)
Stavební úpravy rekreačních zařízení
6
Ø4 in industry
Sušice - Bytové domy – výměna oken 4. etapa
Okna, dveře a související položky
12
Ø6 in industry
Havlíčkova ulice, SO 02 - rekonstrukce vodovodu, kanalizace a povrchů
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
8
Ø5 in industry
„STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVY PANELOVÉHO DOMU SUŠICE SIRKAŘSKÁ 977 – 980“
Stavební úpravy domů
6
Ø4 in industry
Sušice, ZŠ Lerchova stavební úpravy - bezbariérové řešení
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Silnice Klatovy a.s.
3 16,193,434
Protom Strakonice, s.r.o.
1 15,280,647
Aldast, spol. s r.o.
2 12,118,576
morez stavební s.r.o.
1 9,323,832
Stavební Společnost H a T, spol. s r. o.
1 6,965,300
Other suppliers 6 22,279,569

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 7% (1 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 14)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 7% (1 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 21% (3 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 7% (1 from 14)