Small cities • 2016

Obec Radim

IČO 00235661

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

42%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

12%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Geosan Stavební a.s.
1 575,923,242
Česká spořitelna, a.s.
1 97,285,547
Malcom Cz s.r.o.
1 12,600,000
Garnets Consulting a.s.
1 11,138,700
Akant Art, v.o.s.
1 9,548,262
Other suppliers 6 16,992,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 100% (1 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 36% (4 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 27% (3 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (2 from 11)