Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Obec Radim

IČO 00235661

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

22%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření skládky TKO Radim - výstavba 3. kazety II. etapy

3
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka strojů – bubnového třídiče a pomaloběžného drtiče vč. odkoupení stávajícího stroje od zadavatele.

1
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka kompaktoru tuhých komunálních odpadů
Machinery for the production and use of mechanical power
2
Ø2 in industry
Radim - obnova kaple Nejsvětějšího Vykupitele v Radimi

2
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka popelářského vozu
Refuse-collection vehicles
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

63%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
GEOMINING, a.s.
1 24,681,253
PASTELL spol. s r.o.
1 14,096,618
MALCOM CZ s.r.o.
1 12,600,000
AWP s.r.o.
1 11,400,000
AKANT ART, v.o.s.
1 9,548,262
Other suppliers 1 4,675,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 67% (2 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 783,320,622
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 194,951,633

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

21%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekultivace skládky odpadů Radim – 4. etapa
Emergency
- 24,681,253

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (1 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders