Small cities • 2016

Město Rakovník

IČO 00244309

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu 3. ZŠ Rakovník
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. Luženská, Rakovník
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Zástavba dvorního traktu radnice Rakovník - část E a F: Služebna Městské policie
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace památkové zóny III. etapa, dokončení Vysoké ulice
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø5 in industry
RPS - Rakovník, Klicperova - jedna etapa
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

74%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
4 25,009,349
Pozemstav Prostějov,a.s.
3 24,794,271
Berger Bohemia a. s.
1 15,998,256
Konsit a.s.
1 12,379,301
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
2 9,773,881
Other suppliers 10 27,532,789

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (2 from 6)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.43

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (2 from 21)
Final or estimated price not published 24% (5 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 21)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 19% (4 from 21)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 21)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (2 from 21)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 5% (1 from 21)