Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Mladá Boleslav

IČO 00238295

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

42%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Svoz a likvidace odpadu na území Statutárního města Mladá Boleslav
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
2
Ø2 in industry
Nástavba a stavební úpravy budovy u 2.ZŠ Komenského náměstí 94, Mladá Boleslav
Stavební úpravy školních budov
3
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace objektu BD Laurinova I., Mladá Boleslav – II. etapa
Stavební úpravy bytových domů a rodinných domů
8
Ø5 in industry
Cyklostezka Havlíčkova
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
4
Ø5 in industry
Nástavba technických učeben nad stáv. jídelnou 3.ZŠ Mladá Boleslav - zajištění bezbariérovosti
Stavební úpravy školních budov
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

60%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
COMPAG MLADÁ BOLESLAV s.r.o.
1 219,845,119
KAZIKO a.s.
2 57,120,671
EMH stavební CZ s.r.o.
4 38,153,241
H-INTES s.r.o.
5 32,410,888
Sdružení U Stadionu - EKIS + Šlehofer
1 26,045,046
Other suppliers 30 123,591,103

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 65% (11 from 17)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 17)
Lots 0% (0 from 17)
E-auction 0% (0 from 17)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

79%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,631,078,303
Unregulated purchases 950,193,750
Total 2,581,272,054

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

75%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

94%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 6%
Average requirements modifications count 0.41

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

45%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 22% (10 from 45)
Final or estimated price not published 7% (3 from 45)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 45)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 45)
Missing buyer ID 4% (2 from 45)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 45)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 45)
Missing call for tenders 7% (3 from 45)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

38%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 74% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.43 (average mistakes per contract)