Small cities • 2016

Město Pelhřimov

IČO 00248801

There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

91.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

69%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření ČOV Pelhřimov
Stavební práce na výstavbě čistíren odpadních vod
6
Ø5 in industry
PELHŘIMOV - REKONSTRUKCE INŽENÝRSKÝCH SÍTÍ V ULICI DOBIÁŠOVA
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
8
Ø5 in industry
Průmyslová zóna Ke Skrýšovu, Pelhřimov - II. etapa
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
8
Ø6 in industry
Pelhřimov - ulice Příkopy, oprava inženýrských sítí
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
6
Ø5 in industry
Realizace úspor energie v objektu KD Máj, Pelhřimov
Rekonstrukce budov
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

36%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
1 226,815,393
Vhst s.r.o.
3 37,115,000
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
2 20,861,000
Bačina stavební firma a.s.
2 17,351,095
Status stavební a.s.
2 17,242,000
Other suppliers 13 49,467,228

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

78%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 9% (2 from 23)
Final or estimated price not published 57% (13 from 23)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 23)
Missing supplier ID 4% (1 from 23)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 23)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 23)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 23)
Missing call for tenders 48% (11 from 23)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 9% (2 from 23)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 23)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier donating to political party 4% (1 from 23)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 9% (2 from 23)