City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 14

IČO 00231312

Good buyer. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

3.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 53%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Energetická úspora budovy ZŠ Vybíralova
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Energetická úspora budovy MŠ Chvaletická a Energetická úspora MŠ Štolmířská
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Park Pilská - 1. Etapa
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budov MŠ v ulici Vybíralova č. p. 967, 968 a 969 – Praha 14 (II.)
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Realizace e-Governmentu pro Prahu 14
Služby informačních technologií
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Imos Brno, a.s.
2 69,186,682
Your System, spol.s r.o.
3 19,249,106
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 15,242,918
Nepro stavební a.s.
1 14,383,643
Komwag, podnik čistoty a údržby města, a.s.
1 8,854,984
Other suppliers 20 57,786,892

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 81%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

81%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 0.42

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 28)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (4 from 28)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 28)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 28)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 28)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 28)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 28)
Missing call for tenders 21% (6 from 28)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

86%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 28)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 4% (1 from 28)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 28)
Supplier donating to political party 11% (3 from 28)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 21% (6 from 28)