City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 11

IČO 00231126

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is high.

3.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce objektu Schulhoffova 844/2
Construction work
9
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce pavilonu E - tělocvičen ZŠ k Milíčovu 674, Praha 4
Construction work
3
Ø5 in industry
REVITALIZACE OBJEKTU STŘEDNÍ ŠKOLY MANAGEMENTU A SLUŽEB V PRAZE 11

8
Ø5 in industry
Údržba zeleně a úklid veřejných ploch

15
Ø5 in industry
Údržba zeleně a úklid veřejných ploch

14
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
1 67,114,914
PROMINECON CZ a.s.
1 59,894,464
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
4 47,986,824
WEBEL s.r.o.
2 16,187,723
Pražská energetika, a.s.
1 9,431,425
Other suppliers 10 45,976,964

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

82%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (3 from 6)
Nonprice competition 33% (2 from 6)
Division into lots 17% (1 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 6)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 88%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Revitalizace střední školy managementu a služeb v Praze 11, dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 1,286,846
Regenerace MŠ Janouchova 671 - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 568,774
„Regenerace MŠ Janouchova 671 – dodatečné stavební práce“
Additional works
- Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

79%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 22)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (1 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Wrong buyer name 9% (2 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 22)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 22)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

55%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.48 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders