City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 11

IČO 00231126

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is high.

3.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce objektu Schulhoffova 844/2
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce pavilonu E - tělocvičen ZŠ k Milíčovu 674, Praha 4
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
REVITALIZACE OBJEKTU STŘEDNÍ ŠKOLY MANAGEMENTU A SLUŽEB V PRAZE 11
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Údržba zeleně a úklid veřejných ploch
Zahradnické služby
15
Ø5 in industry
Údržba zeleně a úklid veřejných ploch
Zahradnické služby
14
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Metrostav a.s.
1 67,114,914
PROMINECON CZ a.s.
1 59,894,464
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
4 47,986,824
WEBEL s.r.o.
2 16,187,723
Pražská energetika, a.s.
1 9,431,425
Other suppliers 10 45,976,964

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

82%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (3 from 6)
Nonprice competition 33% (2 from 6)
Lots 17% (1 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 88%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Revitalizace střední školy managementu a služeb v Praze 11, dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
1,286,846
Regenerace MŠ Janouchova 671 - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
568,774
„Regenerace MŠ Janouchova 671 – dodatečné stavební práce“
Additional works
Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

79%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 22)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (1 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Wrong buyer name 9% (2 from 22)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

55%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.48 (average mistakes per contract)