Large cities • 2016

Město Chrudim

IČO 00270211

Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law. Suppliers show significant risks of corruption or inefficiency.

29.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

77%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce komunikací a veřejného osvětlení v lokalitě IPRM, Chrudim
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
15
Ø6 in industry
Výstavba tribuny Městský stadion ul. Novoměstská, Chrudim
Výstavba jednoúčelových sportovních zařízení
9
Ø4 in industry
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných objektech v majetku města Chrudim
Energetické a související služby
3
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Revoluční a Rooseveltova, Chrudim a Rekonstrukce vnitrobloku Palackého, Chrudim
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
15
Ø5 in industry
Centrální dodávka silové elektrické energie pro město Chrudim, jeho příspěvkové organizace a právnické osoby, v nichž má město 100 % podíl
Elektrická energie
5
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Matex Hk s.r.o.
12 40,695,029
D & D Profi, s. r. o.
8 20,282,132
První Stavební Chrudim a.s.
1 17,464,755
Amper Market, a.s.
2 15,067,930
Amper Savings, a.s.
2 14,303,500
Other suppliers 7 12,132,874

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

40%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 120,599,571
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 615,290,860
Total 735,890,430

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

74%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

73%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 7%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 0.46

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 33)
Final or estimated price not published 18% (6 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing supplier ID 6% (2 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 33)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 3% (1 from 33)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 33)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 33)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

56%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 62% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.39 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

69%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 33)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier donating to political party 36% (12 from 33)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 39% (13 from 33)