Small cities • 2016

Město Holešov

IČO 00287172

Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

91.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Humanizace Centra pro seniory v Holešově - 2. etapa
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace ulic v Holešově
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení 3. Základní školy Holešov
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
"Zateplení a úspory 1. Základní školy Holešov"
Opláštění budov
12
Ø6 in industry
Ozelenění protihlukového zemního valu u JV obchvatu Holešova
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
11
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

56%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Rapos, spol. s r.o.
2 35,448,876
Strabag a.s.
2 30,445,438
Trigema Building a.s.
1 7,343,879
Green Project s.r.o.
1 7,038,875
Stavební firma Hanáček, s.r.o.
1 5,688,982
Other suppliers 4 10,572,893

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (3 from 0)
Nonprice competition 25% (2 from 8)
Division into lots 12% (1 from 8)
E-auction 0% (0 from 8)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 8)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

78%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.88

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 18% (2 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 9% (1 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 11)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 18% (2 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 36% (4 from 11)