Small cities • 2016

Město Studénka

IČO 00298441

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce MŠ Poštovní
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
6
Ø5 in industry
"REKONSTRUKCE MŠ POŠTOVNÍ – SANAČNÍ PRÁCE"
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
"ZŠ Butovická - energetická opatření" - II
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Údržba veřejné zeleně ve městě Studénka
Zahradnické služby
8
Ø6 in industry
Obnova zeleně vybraných lokalit ve Studénce - II
Služby související s údržbou okrasných zahrad a parků
8
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Omlux, spol. s r.o.
1 17,020,000
Dev Company, spol. s r. o.
1 12,492,154
Mh - Stavby, s.r.o.
1 9,086,612
Údržba pozemků, a.s.
1 7,200,792
Svobodné Zahrady Klus, s.r.o.
1 3,186,172
Other suppliers 11 14,512,651

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

76%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 60% (3 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 40% (2 from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 2.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 12% (2 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Call and award notices contradict each other 6% (1 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 38% (6 from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 12% (2 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (1 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 31% (5 from 16)