Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Studénka

IČO 00298441

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's The competition for contracts is high.

4.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Údržba veřejné zeleně ve městě Studénka
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
2
Ø4 in industry
"ZŠ Butovická - energetická opatření" - II
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Údržba veřejné zeleně ve městě Studénka
Zahradnické služby
8
Ø5 in industry
Suché poldry ve Studénce, priorita č. I. a II.
Výstavba přehrad a podobných pevných staveb
26
Ø10 in industry
Bezbariérové chodníky a přechody pro chodce ve Studénce - část 1 a 2
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
9
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VYKRUT zahradní služby a.s.
1 10,473,697
MH - STAVBY, s.r.o.
1 9,086,612
Údržba pozemků, a.s.
1 7,200,793
PAS Natura s.r.o.
1 5,822,000
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
2 4,705,816
Other suppliers 7 12,989,119

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

94%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 91,818,963
Unregulated purchases 288,388,855
Total 380,207,818

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

93%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 13% (2 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 20% (3 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 64% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.79 (average mistakes per contract)