Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Studénka

IČO 00298441

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's The competition for contracts is high.

4.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VYKRUT zahradní služby a.s.
1 10,473,697
MH - STAVBY, s.r.o.
1 9,086,612
Údržba pozemků, a.s.
1 7,200,793
PAS Natura s.r.o.
1 5,822,000
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
2 4,705,816
Other suppliers 7 12,989,119

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

94%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (2 from 7)
Nonprice competition 14% (1 from 7)
Division into lots 43% (3 from 7)
E-auction 29% (2 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 91,818,963
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 288,388,855
Total 380,207,818

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

93%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 13% (2 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 20% (3 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 64% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.79 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders