Small cities • 2016

Město Vlašim

IČO 00232947

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

91.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

89%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Připojení obcí Bolina a Bolinka na vodohospodářskou infrastrukturu města Vlašimi
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
9
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Severní Vlašim
Stavební úpravy školních budov
12
Ø5 in industry
"Revitalizace obvodového pláště - zdravotní středisko Vlašim"
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
8
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace obvodového pláště Zdravotního střediska ve Vlašimi
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících pro zdravotní péči
8
Ø4 in industry
"Konsolidace IT a nové služby TC města Vlašim"
Informační technologie: poradenství, vývoj programového vybavení, internet a podpora
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

29%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Syner Vhs Vysočina, a.s.
1 93,700,000
S-b s.r.o.
1 13,806,734
Kaziko a.s.
1 6,194,539
Inkoma Stav s.r.o.
1 5,887,330
C System Cz a.s.
1 5,620,930
Other suppliers 4 15,221,791

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

94%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 44% (4 from 9)