Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Vlašim

IČO 00232947

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zvýšení bezpečnosti chodců podél silnice II/112 v úseku od Domašínské brány k budově Diakonie ve Vlašimi
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
4
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba chodníku v obci Bolinka podél silnice č. II/112 - ISPROFOND 5217510174
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
11
Ø5 in industry
Čerpací stanice Štěpánka - výměna čerpací techniky
Čerpadla
3
Ø1 in industry
Zajištění odborné péče o nelesní keřovou a stromovou zeleň v zastavěném území ve Vlašimi a spravovaných obcích
Zemědělské, lesnické, zahradnické služby a služby v oblasti akvakultury a včelařství
2
Ø3 in industry
Výstavba chodníku v obci Bolinka podél silnice č. II/112 – ISPROFOND 5217510174 - dodatečné stavební práce
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

44%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
STRABAG a.s.
1 10,543,081
„Společnost SWIETELSKY a VHST - Bolinka“
2 9,529,387
ENVI-PUR, s.r.o.
1 4,098,386
ZO ČSOP Vlašim
1 1,570,683

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

45%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 162,074,475
Unregulated purchases 646,184,814
Total 808,259,289

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (1 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 20% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.80 (average mistakes per contract)