Small cities • 2016

Město Hronov

IČO 00272680

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy, nástavba a přístavba zimního stadionu v Hronově
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
12
Ø4 in industry
Zbečník - Hronov - chodníky
Stavební úpravy chodníků
4
Ø6 in industry
Místní komunikace Zbečník
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
5
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace sídelní zeleně města Hronov
Služby související s údržbou okrasných zahrad a parků
3
Ø6 in industry
VÝBĚROVÉ ŘÍZENÍ NA DODAVATELE STAVBY PRO PROJEKT:„INSTALACE OZE A ZATEPLENÍ OBJEKTU ZŠ VELKÝ DŘEVÍČ“
Stavební úpravy školních budov
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
4 16,983,429
Matex Hk s.r.o.
1 14,231,413
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 5,792,433
Českomoravská komoditní burza Kladno
2 5,539,834
Broumovské stavební sdružení s.r.o.
1 4,660,466
Other suppliers 4 8,037,429

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

73%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

72%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (1 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 54% (7 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 23% (3 from 13)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 15% (2 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 8% (1 from 13)