Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Hronov

IČO 00272680

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
AQUA MINERALIS GLACENSIS - Revitalizace parku A. Jiráska - Hronov
Construction work
5
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy kuchyně ZŠ a MŠ Hronov, Čapkova 193

8
Ø5 in industry
Místní komunikace Zbečník

5
Ø7 in industry
Zateplení DPS a BD, č. p. 36 a 160, Hostovského, Hronov
Construction work
10
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce strojovny chlazení zimního stadionu v Hronově
Refrigerating equipment
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

54%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
GREEN PROJECT s.r.o.
1 22,629,057
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
2 8,642,819
MATEX HK s.r.o.
1 7,774,501
ACG-Real s.r.o.
1 7,387,586
ENERGO CHOCEŇ, s.r.o.
1 6,939,700

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 99,975,849
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 121,221,813
Total 221,197,661

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Místní komunikace Zbečník - jednací řízení bez uveřejnění
Additional works
- 961,653

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

79%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 50% (3 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 17% (1 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

75%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.33 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders