Small cities • 2016

Město Benátky nad Jizerou

IČO 00237442

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace nivy řeky Jizery v Benátkách nad Jizerou
Výstavba vodních děl
3
Ø5 in industry
"CITY PARK" Benátky nad Jizerou
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací ve městě Benátky nad Jizerou
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø5 in industry
Přestavba multifunkčního centra, č. p. 655, Benátky nad Jizerou
Přestavba budov
9
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění skalního svahu v ulici Pickova a Pod Remízkem
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
H-intes s.r.o.
3 30,088,101
Hochtief Cz a. s.
1 19,562,506
Zeta Benátky s.r.o.
3 18,261,801
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 17,601,299
Roneli Se
1 9,495,172
Other suppliers 6 25,123,773

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 60% (3 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Inovativni 0% ( from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

59%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Puvodni zakazka (Kč) Zmena zavazku / JRBU (Kč)
Sběr, svoz a využívání biologicky rozložitelných odpadů ve městě Benátky nad Jizerou
Not disclosed
- 6,966,000
Čistící vůz na komunikace pro město Benátky nad Jizerou
Not disclosed
- 3,884,600
Čistící vůz na komunikace pro město Benátky nad Jizerou
Not disclosed
- 3,884,600

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.43

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 7% (1 from 15)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 15)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 15)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 15)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier donating to political party 13% (2 from 15)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (3 from 15)