Small cities • 2016

Město Benátky nad Jizerou

IČO 00237442

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace nivy řeky Jizery v Benátkách nad Jizerou
Výstavba vodních děl
3
Ø5 in industry
"CITY PARK" Benátky nad Jizerou
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací ve městě Benátky nad Jizerou
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø5 in industry
Přestavba multifunkčního centra, č. p. 655, Benátky nad Jizerou
Přestavba budov
9
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění skalního svahu v ulici Pickova a Pod Remízkem
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
H-intes s.r.o.
3 30,088,101
Hochtief Cz a. s.
1 19,562,506
Zeta Benátky s.r.o.
3 18,261,801
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 17,601,299
Roneli Se
1 9,495,172
Other suppliers 6 25,123,773

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 60% (3 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

59%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Sběr, svoz a využívání biologicky rozložitelných odpadů ve městě Benátky nad Jizerou
Not disclosed
6,966,000
Čistící vůz na komunikace pro město Benátky nad Jizerou
Not disclosed
3,884,600
Čistící vůz na komunikace pro město Benátky nad Jizerou
Not disclosed
3,884,600

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.43

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 7% (1 from 15)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 15)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier donating to political party 13% (2 from 15)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (3 from 15)