Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Benátky nad Jizerou

IČO 00237442

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

11.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací ve městě Benátky nad Jizerou
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø7 in industry
Výstavba TI pro výstavbu RD v lokalitě Nad Stadionem v Obodři
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
3
Ø7 in industry
Rehabilitace a revitalizace podzámeckého parku
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Přestavba multifunkčního centra, č. p. 655, Benátky nad Jizerou
Přestavba budov
9
Ø4 in industry
Přestavba multifunkčního centra 2. a 3. NP, č. p. 655, Benátky nad Jizerou
Rekonstrukce budov
10
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

63%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
H-INTES s.r.o.
3 37,864,245
RONELI SE
2 18,288,868
NISAINVEST, spol. s r.o.
1 8,120,000
SYNER, s.r.o.
1 6,308,848
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 6,308,848
Other suppliers 4 22,543,174

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 25% (1 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 186,623,998
Unregulated purchases 440,844,874
Total 627,468,873

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

94%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 91% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.09 (average mistakes per contract)