Large cities • 2016

Město Kolín

IČO 00235440

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

24%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vodos s.r.o.
1 458,078,304
Avers, spol. s r.o.
2 40,298,777
V.p. Procházka s.r.o.
1 33,536,260
Vhh Thermont s.r.o.
4 31,563,835
Ave Kolín s.r.o.
1 16,442,540
Other suppliers 30 68,040,850

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

78%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (2 from 4)
Nonprice competition 25% (1 from 4)
Lots 50% (2 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 647,960,571
Unregulated purchases 516,450,267
Total 1,164,410,838

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

25%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 62%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 0.58

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

13%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 39)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (3 from 39)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 39)
Missing supplier ID 13% (5 from 39)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 39)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 39)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 39)
Missing call for tenders 31% (12 from 39)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

30%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 46% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.37 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

39%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 39)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 3% (1 from 39)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (1 from 39)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 39)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 39)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (4 from 39)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (7 from 39)