Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Kolín

IČO 00235440

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
"Výběr provozovatele vodohospodářské infrastruktury města Kolín"
Veřejné služby
3
Ø3 in industry
Výstavba dopravního terminálu Kolín
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících silniční dopravě
6
Ø6 in industry
Revitalizace areálu sv. Bartoloměje v Kolíně
Rekonstrukce budov
3
Ø4 in industry
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC ve vybraných budovách v majetku města Kolín
Technické projektování
5
Ø4 in industry
Oprava krytu místní komunikace a stavební úpravy okružních křižovatek v ulici Masarykova, Kolín
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

29%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VODOS s.r.o.
1 458,078,304
STRABAG a.s., odštěpný závod Praha
1 48,895,152
ENESA a.s.
1 35,037,310
BFK service a.s.
2 34,164,019
GEMA ART GROUP a.s.
1 24,322,136
Other suppliers 19 84,971,965

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 858,492,428
Unregulated purchases 1,051,671,729
Total 1,910,164,157

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Podnikatelský inkubátor - kolínský zámek: Provedení stavebních prací
Outside directive scope
1,430,616
Dodatečné stavební práce k akci: Rekonstrukce vodárenské věže pro cestovní ruch
Outside directive scope
306,543
Rekonstrukce ulice Březinova
Outside directive scope
142,399

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

40%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 28)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 28)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 28)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 28)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 28)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 28)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 28)
Missing call for tenders 14% (4 from 28)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 68% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.92 (average mistakes per contract)