Small cities • 2016

Město Neratovice

IČO 00237108

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

129.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

84%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
REKONSTRUKCE OBVODOVÉHO A STŘEŠNÍHO PLÁŠTĚ III. ZŠ NERATOVICE
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Neratovice-Mlékojedy - splašková kanalizace a ČOV
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice 28. října a rekonstrukce ulice Dr. E. Beneše, Neratovice
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace ulice U Závor Neratovice
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
7
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace ulice Masarykova Neratovice
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

74%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Mane Stavební s.r.o.
1 37,970,364
Bak stavební společnost, a.s.
1 29,115,446
Colas Cz, a.s.
1 18,304,000
Strabag a.s.
2 17,861,186
Emh stavební Cz s.r.o.
3 11,365,054
Other suppliers 10 36,567,719

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
" Rekonstrukce dětského hřiště v ulici Alšova v Neratovicích“
Not disclosed
1,770,950
JŘBU - Dodatečné stavební práce k akci: Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu MŠ Kaštánek, Neratovice
Dodatečné práce
494,614

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

39%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 18%
Cancelled contracts 18%
Average requirements modifications count 1.36

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (2 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 22% (4 from 18)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

86%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 6% (1 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 11% (2 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (2 from 18)