Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Plzeň

IČO 00075370

Court found serious misconduct. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

68%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Uzel Plzeň, 3.stavba – přesmyk domažlické trati
Výstavba mostů
7
Ø8 in industry
Uzel Plzeň, 2. stavba - přestavba osobního nádraží, včetně mostů Mikulášská
Výstavba meziměstských železničních drah
5
Ø3 in industry
Přestupní terminál Plzeň/Šumavská - autobusový terminál
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Dostavba víceúčelové sportovní haly v areálu městské sportovní haly na Slovanech
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
6
Ø4 in industry
Zimní údržba vybraných místních komunikací v Plzni v zimních obdobích 2016/2017 až 2023/2024
Opravy a údržba silnic a dalších zařízení a související služby
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
6 640,076,739
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
4 568,935,564
Swietelsky Rail CZ s.r.o.
1 542,436,651
OHL ŽS, a.s.
1 473,972,771
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
11 254,860,280
Other suppliers 161 1,198,599,453

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

64%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 41% (32 from 78)
Nonprice competition 4% (3 from 78)
Lots 9% (7 from 78)
E-auction 3% (2 from 78)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 5,969,540,271
Unregulated purchases 11,977,869,473
Total 17,947,409,744

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

71%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 1.13

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (7 from 201)
Final or estimated price not published 18% (37 from 201)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 201)
Missing supplier ID 4% (9 from 201)
Missing buyer ID 2% (4 from 201)
Wrong buyer name 45% (90 from 201)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 201)
Missing call for tenders 6% (12 from 201)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

30%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.81 (average mistakes per contract)