Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Plzeň

IČO 00075370

Court found serious misconduct. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

68%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
6 640,076,739
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
4 568,935,564
Swietelsky Rail CZ s.r.o.
1 542,436,651
OHL ŽS, a.s.
1 473,972,771
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
11 254,860,280
Other suppliers 161 1,198,599,453

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

64%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 41% (32 from 78)
Nonprice competition 4% (3 from 78)
Division into lots 9% (7 from 78)
E-auction 3% (2 from 78)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 78)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 5,969,540,271
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 11,977,869,473
Total 17,947,409,744

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup projektové dokumentace - Rekonstrukce úpravny vody Plzeň
Authorship rights
- 21,748,543
Úslavský kanalizační sběrač - 2. etapa, 1. fáze - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 13,842,434
Zhotovitel díla „Rekonstrukce a modernizace úpravny vody Plzeň“ - doplnění 10-23
Additional works
- 12,277,041
Náhradní hřiště pro TJ Slovan Spoje Plzeň
Additional works
- 9,376,843
Rekonstrukce Borská s křižovatkou Belánka v Plzni, II. etapa - JŘBU 1
Additional works
- 6,748,090

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

71%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 1.13

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (7 from 201)
Final or estimated price not published 18% (37 from 201)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 201)
Missing supplier ID 4% (9 from 201)
Missing buyer ID 2% (4 from 201)
Wrong buyer name 45% (90 from 201)
Missing call for tenders 6% (12 from 201)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 201)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 201)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

30%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.81 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 180 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders