Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Ústí nad Labem

IČO 00081531

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

21.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Komunální služby pro Ústí nad Labem
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
3
Ø3 in industry
Plavecký areál Klíše
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
9
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy Městského fotbalového stadionu v Ústí nad Labem
Výstavba stadionů
6
Ø4 in industry
Zajištění komunálních služeb (čištění a zimní údržba komunikací pro pěší) ve Statutárním městě Ústí nad Labem
Čistící a hygienické služby v městských a venkovských oblastech a související služby
2
Ø3 in industry
„Rekonstrukce a modernizace zastávek a zálivů zastávek“
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících silniční dopravě
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

33%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ave Ústí nad Labem s.r.o.
12 806,056,409
Metrostav a.s.
1 207,500,000
Metall Quatro spol. s r.o.
1 139,066,115
Insky spol. s r.o.
3 44,856,472
Centropol Energy, a.s.
3 26,120,960
Other suppliers 30 72,963,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

92%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 89% (16 from 18)
Nonprice competition 33% (6 from 18)
Lots 61% (11 from 18)
E-auction 11% (2 from 18)
Inovativni 0% ( from 18)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

79%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,305,101,731
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 799,462,668
Total 2,104,564,399

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

65%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 6%
Cancelled contracts 5%
Average requirements modifications count 0.62

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 50)
Final or estimated price not published 26% (13 from 50)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 50)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 50)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 50)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 50)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 50)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 50)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 50)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 55% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.73 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 50)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 50)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 50)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 50)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 50)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 50)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (6 from 50)