Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Ústí nad Labem

IČO 00081531

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

84%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Komunální služby pro Ústí nad Labem
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
3
Ø2 in industry
Komunální služby pro Ústí nad Labem
Čištění a zametání ulic
3
Ø2 in industry
Komunální služby pro Ústí nad Labem
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
3
Ø2 in industry
Opravy místních komunikací a jejich součástí
Práce na opravě silnic
4
Ø6 in industry
Komunální služby pro Ústí nad Labem
Úklidové služby
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

11%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AVE Ústí nad Labem s.r.o.
6 791,208,158
INSKY spol. s r.o.
2 69,206,650
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
4 35,680,327
STRABAG Rail a.s.
1 19,722,400
Patrik Hart - KUBOTA
1 8,608,000
Other suppliers 16 43,749,245

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,448,218,594
Unregulated purchases 1,710,838,344
Total 3,159,056,937

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (2 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (2 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 5% (1 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

9%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 35% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.06 (average mistakes per contract)