Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Ústí nad Labem

IČO 00081531

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 52%
Largest contracts
Komunální služby pro Ústí nad Labem
Refuse and waste related services
Ø2 in industry
Komunální služby pro Ústí nad Labem
Street-cleaning and sweeping services
Ø2 in industry
Komunální služby pro Ústí nad Labem
Refuse and waste related services
Ø2 in industry
Opravy místních komunikací a jejich součástí
Road-repair works
Ø6 in industry
Komunální služby pro Ústí nad Labem
Cleaning services
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AVE Ústí nad Labem s.r.o.
6 791,208,158
INSKY spol. s r.o.
2 69,206,650
4 35,680,327
STRABAG Rail a.s.
1 19,722,400
Patrik Hart - KUBOTA
1 8,608,000
Other suppliers 16 43,749,245

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 71%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,448,218,594
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,710,838,344
Total 3,159,056,937

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (2 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (2 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 5% (1 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 35% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.06 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders