Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Kutná Hora

IČO 00236195

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
Sportovní hala Klimeška - 2. etapa
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work
Ø5 in industry
Sportovní hala areál Klimeška -Kutná Hora
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work
Ø4 in industry
Dačického dům v Kutné Hoře - Vzdělávací a prezentační centrum kulturního dědictví UNESCO
Restoration work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Česká Kutná Hora
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
Ø7 in industry
Výběr dodavatele sdružených služeb dodávek zemního plynu na roky 2016 a 2017
Natural gas
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PKS stavby a.s.
2 110,977,611
Kutnohorská stavební, s.r.o.
6 41,088,400
2 14,322,153
AV MEDIA, a.s.
2 7,733,596
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o.
1 7,462,588
Other suppliers 13 34,867,003

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 295,116,849
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 906,965,909
Total 1,202,082,758

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 28)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 28)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 28)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 28)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 28)
Wrong buyer name 4% (1 from 28)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 28)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 28)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 28)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 16% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.96 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 25 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders