Small cities • 2016

Město Mariánské Lázně

IČO 00254061

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

53.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

68%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce budovy bývalé OA pro ZUŠ
Rekonstrukce budov
7
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. Palackého – 2. a 3. etapa, Mariánské Lázně
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
8
Ø5 in industry
Mariánské Lázně – údržba městské zeleně část 2 - Obvod I b
Služby související s údržbou okrasných zahrad a parků
6
Ø6 in industry
Instalace solárního systému na plaveckém bazénu Města Mariánské Lázně
Solární kolektory pro výrobu tepla
3
Ø2 in industry
Komplexní revitalizace centrálních parků v Mariánských Lázních - část IV
Zahradnické služby
4
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Bauing Kv s.r.o.
7 23,205,550
Colas Cz, a.s.
2 21,225,219
Zbyněk Martinek
1 8,282,698
Zahradní a parková spol. s r.o.
1 7,038,309
Next  Invest  s.r.o.
2 6,481,200
Other suppliers 10 22,355,403

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Inovativni 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

78%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 24)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (3 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 24)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 4% (1 from 24)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 24)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 24)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 24)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (2 from 24)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (4 from 24)