Large cities • 2016

Město Český Těšín

IČO 00297437

The competition for contracts is low. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

34%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Rekonstrukce a dostavba zimního stadionu – II. etapa, zastřešení zimního stadionu se vznikem víceúčelové sportovní haly“
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Realizace energetických úspor metodou EPC na vybraných objektech v majetku města Český Těšín
Energetické a související služby
3
Ø3 in industry
"Revitalizace veřejných prostranství, III. etapa"
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø5 in industry
„Odstranění stavebních objektů v Českém Těšíně“
Demolice a zemní práce
3
Ø4 in industry
„Zahrada dvou břehů 2013 - 2015“
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pozemní stavitelství Zlín a.s.
3 56,881,619
Evč s.r.o.
2 30,629,418
Polanský s.r.o.
2 14,277,463
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 13,794,380
Staseko Plus s.r.o.
2 11,184,960
Other suppliers 19 41,440,809

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 6)
Nonprice competition 50% (3 from 6)
Lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Inovativni 0% ( from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 168,208,650
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 428,336,880
Total 596,545,530

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

69%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.13

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

59%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (3 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 59% (17 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 10% (3 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 3% (1 from 29)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 29)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 96% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 29)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 3% (1 from 29)