Small cities • 2016

Město Pec pod Sněžkou

IČO 00278181

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

8%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

24%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Bak stavební společnost, a.s.
5 15,993,075
Infrastav s.r.o.
1 6,494,366
Super Sport spol. s r.o.
1 1,800,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 0)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

1%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce lanové dráhy na Sněžku - dodatečné stavební práce VI.
Not disclosed
- 7,989,465
"Rekonstrukce lanové dráhy na Sněžku - dodatečné stavební práce V."
Not disclosed
- 3,084,625
"Rekonstrukce lanové dráhy na Sněžku - dodatečné stavební práce IV."
Not disclosed
- 1,978,547
Rekonstrukce lanové dráhy na Sněžku - dodatečné stavební práce VII.
Not disclosed
- 1,928,046
Rekonstrukce lanové dráhy na Sněžku - dodatečné stavební práce III.
Not disclosed
- 1,012,392

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 100%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 7)