Large cities • 2016

Město Kroměříž

IČO 00287351

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Rekultivace skládky Lutopecny“
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu základní školy Oskol v Kroměříži včetně výměny zdroje vytápění
Stavební úpravy školních budov
2
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu základní školy Zachar v Kroměříži
Stavební úpravy školních budov
6
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace zeleně a vybraných komunikací v rámci IPRM Kroměříže – zóna Jihovýchod
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
IPRM Kroměříž Revitalizace sídliště Slovan II
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

69%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Rovina, a.s.
1 53,897,299
Cergomont s.r.o.
1 21,978,831
Mamut - Therm s.r.o.
1 20,120,328
Smo a.s.
1 15,888,091
Hochtief Cz a. s.
1 8,888,123
Other suppliers 11 40,130,871

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 33% (2 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 160,903,545
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 504,813,380
Total 665,716,925

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 11%
Cancelled contracts 22%
Average requirements modifications count 0.78

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

57%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 31% (5 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 74% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.23 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (2 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 19% (3 from 16)