Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Kroměříž

IČO 00287351

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

34%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu základní školy Oskol v Kroměříži včetně výměny zdroje vytápění
Stavební úpravy školních budov
2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce domu kultury Kroměříž včetně interiéru
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka kompostérů, Kroměříž
Kompostovače
2
Ø2 in industry
ENERGETICKÉ ÚSPORY – MĚÚ KROMĚŘÍŽ – B,D
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka a montáž 2 ks rotátorů s výsuvnými zásuvkami pro Městský úřad Kroměříž
Různé kancelářské zařízení a potřeby
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

52%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
CERGOMONT s.r.o.
1 21,978,831
VW WACHAL a.s.
1 15,355,593
ELKOPLAST CZ, s.r.o.
1 5,192,910
Pozemní stavitelství Zlín a.s.
1 4,995,010
MEDIS INFO SECURITY, s.r.o.
1 3,445,200
Other suppliers 1 1,972,278

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (2 from 4)
Nonprice competition 25% (1 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 25% (1 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

40%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 191,961,135
Unregulated purchases 1,004,828,652
Total 1,196,789,786

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

94%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (1 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 12% (1 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

33%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.67 (average mistakes per contract)