Large cities • 2016

Město Písek

IČO 00249998

Court found no legal misconduct. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

24.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Casta dopravní stavby s.r.o.
8 76,890,383
Strabag a.s.
7 64,259,311
Kočí a.s.
3 53,617,707
E.on Energie, a.s.
2 28,983,858
Colas Cz, a.s.
1 24,418,266
Other suppliers 21 123,820,879

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

69%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 16% (3 from 19)
Nonprice competition 11% (2 from 19)
Lots 11% (2 from 19)
E-auction 5% (1 from 19)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 372,407,214
Unregulated purchases 604,568,169
Total 976,975,383

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

69%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

62%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 0.87

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (4 from 42)
Final or estimated price not published 26% (11 from 42)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 42)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 42)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 42)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 42)
Call and award notices contradict each other 12% (5 from 42)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 42)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

44%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.48 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 42)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (2 from 42)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 42)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 29% (12 from 42)