Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Písek

IČO 00249998

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

17.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

36%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Úpravna vody Písek
Výstavba úpraven vody
4
Ø5 in industry
Městská knihovna Písek a centrum vzdělávání
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících vzdělání a výzkumu
3
Ø4 in industry
Sdružené služby dodávky elektřiny pro město Písek, jeho příspěvkové organizace a společnosti, ve kterých má město Písek majetkový podíl
Elektrická energie
2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce Dobrovského ulice v Písku - 2. etapa
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
5
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce Jeronýmovy ulice v Písku
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
5
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

69%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SMP CZ, a.s.
1 178,739,437
OHL ŽS, a.s.
1 132,646,700
Casta dopravní stavby s.r.o.
4 50,907,322
E.ON Energie, a.s.
3 49,412,541
KOČÍ a.s.
3 33,448,886
Other suppliers 29 131,454,464

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

81%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 28% (7 from 25)
Nonprice competition 16% (4 from 25)
Lots 12% (3 from 25)
E-auction 12% (3 from 25)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 796,983,145
Unregulated purchases 905,557,332
Total 1,702,540,477

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

74%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 12%
Average requirements modifications count 1.24

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 5% (2 from 44)
Final or estimated price not published 23% (10 from 44)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 44)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 44)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 44)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 44)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 44)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 44)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

67%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.53 (average mistakes per contract)