Small cities • 2016

Město Šternberk

IČO 00299529

Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Multifunkční kulturní zařízení Šternberk - I. etapa
Rekonstrukce budov
9
Ø5 in industry
Šternberk, lokalita ulic Masarykova - Krampolova
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících silniční dopravě
5
Ø4 in industry
Sdružené dodávky elektrické energie pro město Šternberk a provozovatele majetku města
Elektrická energie
neuveden
Ø4 in industry
Město Šternberk – Komunální služby
Čistící a hygienické služby v městských a venkovských oblastech a související služby
2
Ø3 in industry
Sdružené dodávky zemního plynu pro město Šternberk a provozovatele majetku města
Zemní plyn
neuveden
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavební společnost Navrátil, s.r.o.
5 66,340,227
H O R S T A V Olomouc, spol. s r. o.
2 27,895,210
Remit s.r.o.
2 17,980,178
Lumius, spol. s r.o.
2 15,048,920
Kareta s.r.o.
2 8,915,312
Other suppliers 13 45,792,530

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

89%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

58%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.86

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 15% (4 from 26)
Final or estimated price not published 23% (6 from 26)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 26)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 26)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 26)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 26)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 26)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 26)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 26)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 26)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (2 from 26)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 23% (6 from 26)