Small cities • 2016

Město Doksy

IČO 00260444

The competition for contracts is low. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

34%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce stravovacího pavilonu ZŠ K. H. Máchy
Rekonstrukce budov
4
Ø5 in industry
Údržba veřejné zeleně v Doksech a přidružených obcích 2014 - 2018
Zahradnické služby
4
Ø6 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti domu čp. 19 v Doksech
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Svoz odpadu – město Doksy
Odstraňování a čištění odpadu
2
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu kina Máj Doksy
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Bes renova s.r.o.
6 15,917,852
Cl-evans s.r.o.
1 13,358,575
V a N Cl s.r.o.
2 12,117,665
Petr Tamchyna
2 7,113,903
Ave Cz odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 6,556,799
Other suppliers 6 14,851,813

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

74%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 60% (3 from 5)
Division into lots 40% (2 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

64%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu kina Máj Doksy
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek, Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 6,205,996
JŘBU - Dodatečné stavební práce k akci: Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy Domova pro seniory, Panská 199, Doksy
Dodatečné práce
- 1,112,561
JŘBU - Dodatečné stavební práce k akci: Snížení energetické náročnosti domu čp. 19 v Doksech
Dodatečné práce
- 70,749

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 5% (1 from 19)
Final or estimated price not published 21% (4 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 19)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

79%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 19)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier donating to political party 21% (4 from 19)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 16% (3 from 19)