Small cities • 2016

Město Mnichovo Hradiště

IČO 00238309

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vybudování varovného a výstražného systému ochrany před povodněmi pro město Mnichovo Hradiště
Elektrické strojní zařízení, přístroje, zařízení a spotřební materiál, osvětlení
3
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti nové budovy ZŠ Sokolovská, Mnichovo Hradiště
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy hasičské zbrojnice Veselá u Mnichova Hradiště
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pohotovostními službami
7
Ø5 in industry
Digitalizace kina v Mnichově Hradišti
Audiovizuální přístroje
4
Ø3 in industry
Správce hřbitovů v Mnichově Hradišti a Veselé
Údržba hřbitovů
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

61%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Telmo a.s.
1 6,777,009
Marhold a.s.
1 4,623,711
Nohynek & Nohynek, s.r.o.
2 3,598,138
D-cinema, s.r.o.
1 1,961,866
Martina Bachová
1 1,770,720
Other suppliers 1 1,566,150

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Inovativni 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Puvodni zakazka (Kč) Zmena zavazku / JRBU (Kč)
Stavební úpravy hasičské zbrojnice Veselá u Mnichova Hradiště
Dodatečné práce
- 260,418

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

81%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 14% (1 from 7)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 7)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

68%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 57% (4 from 7)