Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Mnichovo Hradiště

IČO 00238309

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

19.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění komplexního sběru komunálního odpadu na území města Mnichova Hradiště včetně místních částí
Sběr odpadu
2
Ø2 in industry
Poskytování energetických služeb metodou EPC spojené s provozováním kotelen na vybraných budovách v majetku města Mnichovo Hradiště
Technické projektování
5
Ø4 in industry
Modernizace sportoviště Nad parkem
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
4
Ø5 in industry
Mnichovo Hradiště - Dobrá voda, Lhotice - vodovod
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Oprava fasády radnice čp.1 Mnichovo Hradiště
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

62%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
COMPAG MLADÁ BOLESLAV s.r.o.
1 31,990,735
EVČ s.r.o.
1 28,424,982
SPORTOVNÍ PODLAHY ZLÍN, s.r.o.
1 12,161,965
Roman Hrdlička
1 11,484,000
PRACOM s.r.o.
1 4,816,304
Other suppliers 6 11,758,784

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

67%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

56%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 116,310,653
Unregulated purchases 253,403,385
Total 369,714,038

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (1 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 9% (1 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

68%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.90 (average mistakes per contract)