Large cities • 2016

Hlavní město Praha

IČO 00064581

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

35%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění nakládání s komunálním odpadem na území hl.m. Prahy od 1. 2. 2015 do maximálně 31. 7. 2016 s výjimkou MČ Praha 2, Praha 3, Praha 8, Praha 9, Praha 10, Praha 14 a Praha - Troja
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
1
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění systému nakládání se směsným a tříděným komunálním odpadem na území hl. m. Prahy od 1.11.2013
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
1
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění nakládání se směsným a tříděným komunálním odpadem na území hl. m. Prahy od 1.1.2013
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
1
Ø3 in industry
"Společný objekt Chodovec II"
Výstavba víceúčelových budov
6
Ø4 in industry
Stavba č. 40759 "Multifunkční operační středisko Malovanka"
Výstavba víceúčelových budov
12
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

72%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pražské služby, a.s.
11 3,284,554,997
Geosan Stavební a.s.
1 529,940,841
Vces a.s.
1 417,690,191
Ave Cz odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
5 403,050,230
Eltodo-citelum, s.r.o.
3 329,181,874
Other suppliers 234 3,884,062,536

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

73%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 37% (36 from 97)
Nonprice competition 27% (26 from 97)
Lots 28% (27 from 97)
E-auction 7% (7 from 97)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

34%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 8,848,480,685
Unregulated purchases 68,834,054,058
Total 77,682,534,743

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

11%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

51%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 16%
Cancelled contracts 19%
Average requirements modifications count 0.61

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

79%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (3 from 255)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (28 from 255)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 255)
Missing supplier ID 7% (17 from 255)
Missing buyer ID 0% (1 from 255)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 255)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (4 from 255)
Missing call for tenders 10% (26 from 255)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

1%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 1% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.03 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 255)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 1% (2 from 255)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 255)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 255)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 255)
Supplier donating to political party 5% (14 from 255)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (57 from 255)